Sorry sweetcheek, the girls are not looking for a job. Just exposing a lying cheating bastard.

Take your libel and slander and go shove it up your ass! (Good, now come sue me!)

Yes because girls are totally honest and non-bais and give both sides of the story while hiding behind an anonymous persona.... I all for what this website is doing but its totally one sided... and should not be taken seriously to bring a lawsuit or in any aspect of decision making... that is like suing someone for spreading rumors by passing notes in class....

I just tried to go to the site for entertainment.... 403 forbidden error.

to prove libel has taken place you have to first prove the statement is false. then you have to prove that the statement caused harm. then you have to prove the person being accused of libel didnt preform the proper research to verify that the statement is false.

emphasis on prove.

good luck on that. this guy is just wasting peoples time. most likely his sex life is being devastated and he is now reaping what he sowed for being a douche.

S-Man-2365384----- I am hoping that was an attempt at sarcasm, the girls aren't looking for a job but they are hurting his business with what they say. Slander is the negative spoken word and libel is the negative written word. Both fall under the category of defamation. Gloria Allred should brush up on the law before she makes statements about this never entering a court. Her clients better have absolute proof of their claims. Every single thing they have written about the guy they better be able to back it up. You can not write on a public forum and just hide behind freedom of speech if you are stating it to be fact. He can have his day in court so these ladies can prove that what they said was true. They are victims of what exactly? This was dating and not marriage, correct?

Also, the site is not serving its intended purpose of warning people about liars and cheats. It is much broader when the comments can be found in a Google search. I didn't realize that your livelihood should be ruined because you broke up with someone.

What gives these women the right to post anonymously? You can post the other persons name but not state who you are. This is a system where anyone can post about anyone? Pick a random name from the phone book and post. All the while doing it anonymously but identifying the person they are upset with. If I was on a site like that and there were comments about me that could not possibly be verified I want to know who posted them and have the comments removed and possibly take them to civil court.

How about a site called, Imadeabadchoice dot com? These women chose to go out with the man. Did they take it slow? Did they move fast? Did they get to know him before the lawyer paycheck clouded their judgement? How did he really screw you? Did he have you move in with him? Quit school? Got you pregnant? Give you an STD? Give up your worldly possessions? How did it affect your life other than crying yourself to sleep for a week because boo hoo, you got dumped? Hundreds of millions of people in the US alone and this one guy was the end all be all??????

The funny thing is you never hear "woe is me" tales about regular guys who cheat, only the ones with money. Allred represented the women Tiger slept with but if Tiger was replaced by Joe the Plumber nobody would give it a second thought.

How about a site for reporting gold diggers. Oh wait, women never trade on their looks to get by in life. They've never reached in the trash can for that used condom to get themselves pregnant by the rich guy they met at the club. All those women really thought Tiger was leaving his wife????? Seriously? What about the women that slept with Shawn Kemp even knowing he fathered 150 kids?

I guess using a man for his money just isn't right if he lies and cheats on you. Yes this is speculation but so is everything in the story and every other comment made. I don't know either party involved and none of us know what was said behind closed doors.

I also think the site should be shut down because if this can go on with no complaints why can't we have other sites like, hesucksinbed dot com or theirkidsarebrats.com........you know, a site for anything negative to say about anyone. Can't see the harm in that, right? Look up the kids online before inviting them to your child's birthday party. Check your smartphone app to see if that person who's been buying you drinks is worth going home with.

I think it is good to know if felons and sex offenders live in your neighborhood but I already know plenty of a-holes and bitches, I don't need a list posted on the internet. Friends don't let friends date morons, not websites.

Categorically false. Truth is the absolute defense against claims of Defamation.

@Browns Backer

As for no one cares about Joe Plumber, that is because recording things Joe Plumber did does not generate any money so the major news outlets doesn't care for it.

Website like the aforementioned is exactly what Joe Plumber and his partners need. Now if Person A cheats on you, you can go on the forum and say he did. If Person B is a great date then you should be able to do the same.

The advantage is that now everything you do is judged by others, the disadvantage is that now everything you do is judged by others.

It is a fair trade. If something is not true then that is defamation and the law will take care of it. But IMHO, it is better to have this sort of public forum for grievances than without. The age of information has its dark corners, but ultimately I think it is a move to a positive direction.

even if it is true

Where do you live that it's illegal to tell the truth?

Slandering his professional name with a personal accusation that has nothing to do with his profession is illegal

I thought all this time that libel and slander only existed if what was passed was untrue. If you are a thief and I say you are a thief and it can be proved true I still am sued for slander? Notice Allred only says that women should be able to say and print to expose men as opposed to people exposing people, presumably a man outing the golddigger or cheating girlfriend would be a case she would take...sueing the guy.

Wyllyrd, Browns,

Slander and libel only apply to false accusations. Since there is no way to objectively prove if what she said is true or not he cannot win the case. This is why Newt is screwed with his open marriage issue as well. It is much harder to prove that you did not do something then to prove that you did.

He has no unbiased sources for testimony; his clients, friends, and family are not objective witnesses and neither are hers.

So it isn't remotely possible that two women decided to screw this guy over? We don't even know for a fact if it was two different women posting. They post anonymously so one woman could just as easily posted as more than one woman.

Let me make this clear, I'm not defending a cheat. I am defending the fact that a site like this needs to have some responsibility. It shouldn't be searchable on Google. It is supposed to be a warning tool instead it is ruining parts of this guys life outside of his bedroom because now anyone can see this guys personal life.

More and more, as each generation passes, we blur the line between the digital and real world. We seem to think that a free post online is somehow different. The only way I see it being different is that it can do more widespread damage over a much shorter period of time. Ask anyone that accidentally sent a tweet to the world instead of the person it was meant for. These women could have achieved the same goal if they would have posted their complaints in the local newspaper as an opinion piece. That would have cost money, required more effort and would have exposed them too. We can't have that now can we?

It doesn't matter if it's true, he wasn't obligated by law to be loyal since they were not married. But since they discredited his professional name, with words that have nothing to do with his profession, they did break the law.

By that same token US, its not slander if its true. If he can prove in court that the statements are false, then good for him. But if not, then "Sticks and stones, sticks and stones".

Except it is illegal to target his professional name with a private matter...try again

Its an opinon, just an opinion...and thats legal. If one doesn't like a company's performance and writes a bad review, its allowed. Professional or not, its an opinion, not slander. Alls fair in love and war, but you should know that.

What don't you understand? Attacking a PROFESSIONAL NAME with a PERSONAL matter is illegal, that has already gone to court and won. Dale Ernhart Jr sued over this exact thing and won since his name is used professionally and could not be the target of a personal grudge.

If this was an ex-wife doing it, that would be different. But by law, there was no grounds for a girlfriend to attack his business. He isn't sueing for slander if you failed to notice, he is sueing for attacking his professional name.