Unborn baby Facebook friend requests cause stir

A condom maker's ad agency thought it'd be a swell idea to scare men out of causing unwanted pregnancies by — wait for it — sending them Facebook friend requests from their unborn future offspring.

"Men like a lot of things. But there's something most of them wouldn't like very much," says the narrator in the Olla Condoms ad (above). The next sound you hear: a baby crying.

According to the video, the ad agency identified "some" young men, "created their sons' profile," and sent Facebook friend requests to each of them. The request was from a baby who bore the recipient's very same name — followed by "Jr." A note in the request basically identified it as an ad for the condoms.

But the all-too-clever "Unexpected Babies" social media ad campaign by Brazil's Age Isobar agency appears to be misfiring, so to speak. Even if the requests were sent to just a handful of men, in order to prove the concept, the fallout from the strategy is global.

"No brand shall friend request me, without a lifetime hatred called upon them," hissed "ThomasBigum" on the YouTube page where the video of of the ad is posted.

"Wow, you have officially brought social media advertising down to a whole new low," noted LadyAnne525.

"The behavior is definitely spamming ... but I guess it's more creative than most spam," posted CaeserOct1.

Creative it is. And creating fake profiles for virtual babies of the future sounds like a violation of Facebook's policy.

"Facebook has always been based on a real-name culture ... we believe this leads to greater accountability and a safer and more trusted environment for the people who use our service," said a spokesperson for the social networking site.

"It's a violation of our policies to use a fake name or operate under a false identity, and we encourage people to report anyone they think is doing this."

One way is to go to Facebook's Help Center page on "Report Abuse or Policy Violations."

But the social networking site also has a "dedicated team that reviews these reports and takes action as necessary," the spokesperson said. " We also have technical systems in place to flag and block potential fakes based on name and anomalous site activity."

Either way, it sounds like this ad agency's baby may be abandoned soon.

Related stories:

Check out Technolog, Gadgetbox, Digital Life and In-Game on Facebook, and on Twitter, follow Suzanne Choney.

 

 

Discuss this post

LOL clever - It may not be wise- but I have not seen this pop up, and yet I hear about it here. Seems thier marketing worked if people are finding out about it, and they were not the target market or intended recipient.

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 6:37 PM EST

Brilliant use of Farcebook. Far far better than hearing about someone's dinner plans, shopping experience, thoughts while in a traffic jam, or the latest news about a bowel movement. Besides: such a "friend" request is likely preferred over most such requests from total strangers.....

  • 1 vote
#1.1 - Fri Dec 2, 2011 10:03 AM EST

How retarded

    #1.2 - Sat Dec 3, 2011 4:51 PM EST
    Reply

    A little tasteless if you ask me. The minimum age is 13.

    • 1 vote
    Reply#2 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 8:37 PM EST

    Lots of kids are having sex at 13. Maybe this will make them think about the consequences before they decide to have sex.

    • 6 votes
    #2.1 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 10:47 PM EST

    But you can't have an account if you're under 13. And these babies ages are in the negative years.

    • 5 votes
    #2.2 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 10:55 PM EST

    Lots of kids are having sex at 13. Maybe this will make them think about the consequences before they decide to have sex.

    Yep, the internet is the best place for children to learn all about sex.

    • 4 votes
    #2.3 - Fri Dec 2, 2011 7:37 AM EST

    The evaluation of "tasteless" seems to be based upon age. That's a poor link. Not necessarily valid, but at least requiring further commentary. Better to point out, as has been done in replies, that there is a minimum age and that the advert technically violates that policy.....

    • 1 vote
    #2.4 - Fri Dec 2, 2011 10:06 AM EST
    Reply

    I should whine like most of the others plan to do--- but just being honest here, if something like this keeps their mind on the product and effects of not wearing a condom, I say they have objectively fulfilled their goal!

    • 6 votes
    Reply#3 - Thu Dec 1, 2011 9:16 PM EST

    Several types of preservatives??? What is that? Did they perhaps mean prophylactics?

      Reply#4 - Fri Dec 2, 2011 12:40 AM EST

      Oh, come on! I think it's kind of clever and funny. I can just picture the look on those poor guys' faces... However, it would probably have been a little more professional on the part of the advert agency to just pretend for the commercial that there was a friend request from a future child, instead of actually doing it to unsuspecting people.

      Still funny, though.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#5 - Fri Dec 2, 2011 12:52 AM EST

      This is utterly tacky and tasteless. There are better ways to promote condoms and safe sex that don't involve the violation of FB policy (fake profiles) or spam. A new low in advertising indeed.

        Reply#6 - Fri Dec 2, 2011 4:10 AM EST

        A baby would be welcome in my house...

        • 1 vote
        Reply#7 - Fri Dec 2, 2011 8:35 AM EST

        very clever! I have 3 sons....I should do the same thing to them....

        • 2 votes
        Reply#8 - Fri Dec 2, 2011 8:57 AM EST

        I don't have a problem with it at all; how many deadbeat baby daddies are there that are taxing our social systems due to these 'boys' refusing to take responsibility to a child after making a case to not use a condom 'cause it doesn't feel as good'. These incredibly selfish guys are more than happy to help make babies but leave the mothers to fend for themselves and their children, while doing everything they can to avoid paying child support. Privacy vs. taxpayers having to help to support innocent children. All guys need this sent to them ... and not a bad idea to send it to girls either! Nothing like a good reality dose!

        • 1 vote
        Reply#9 - Fri Dec 2, 2011 9:46 AM EST
        You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
        As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.